Head to head

KuCoin vs Bitget

Both venues are compared on the fees they publish for their base tier, read on the same day from their own fee pages. No funded test stands behind this page.

KuCoin

Spot altcoin range with futures alongside

6.0/10

0.02% maker and 0.06% taker on perpetuals at the base tier.

Futures maker
0.0200%
Futures taker
0.0600%
Spot taker
0.1000%
Fees checked
10 November 2026
Read the KuCoin review

Bitget

Copy trading on spot and futures

6.0/10

0.02% maker and 0.06% taker on perpetuals at the base tier.

Futures maker
0.0200%
Futures taker
0.0600%
Spot taker
0.1000%
Fees checked
10 November 2026
Read the Bitget review

The short version

KuCoin or Bitget: what the published fees say.

KuCoin and Bitget land on the same fee index, 6.0 out of ten, so published fees do not separate them.

Both list the same futures taker rate (0.06%). Both list the same futures maker rate (0.02%). Two market orders on a $10,000 position cost $12.00 at KuCoin and $12.00 at Bitget, before funding.

KuCoin: spot altcoin range with futures alongside. Bitget: copy trading on spot and futures. Neither venue has been through a funded AffMiss test, so this page compares what each one publishes, not how each one fills.

Both venues are scored with the same formulas on fees read the same day. If a figure here disagrees with the venue’s fee page, the fee page is right and this page is out of date.

Where they separate

The fee index scores each venue’s published base-tier fees with the same formulas and weights. The edge column shows which venue scores higher on that line, and by how much.

AreaWeightKuCoinBitgetEdge
Futures taker fee406.06.0level
Futures maker fee306.06.0level
Spot fees306.06.0level
KuCoin 0.06% taker on perpetuals. LV0 rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026.Bitget 0.06% taker on perpetuals. Standard (non-VIP) rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026.
KuCoin 0.02% maker on perpetuals. LV0 rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026.Bitget 0.02% maker on perpetuals. Standard (non-VIP) rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026.
KuCoin 0.10% maker / 0.10% taker on spot. LV0 rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026.Bitget 0.10% maker / 0.10% taker on spot. Standard (non-VIP) rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026.

KuCoin vs Bitget fees

Published base-tier rates from each venue’s own fee page. The cheaper side of each row is marked. Withdrawal fees are set per coin and network and are not compared here.

FeeKuCoinBitgetLower cost
Futures maker0.02%0.02%—
Futures taker0.06%0.06%—
Spot maker0.10%0.10%—
Spot taker0.10%0.10%—
Two taker fills on $10,000$12.00$12.00—
Options maker / takerNot on recordNot on record—
Fees last read10 November 202610 November 2026—

Fee tiers, VIP bands and promotions move without notice. Treat these rows as dated readings and the order ticket as the binding number.

What each venue offers

The facts behind the fee rows, and the limits of this page: neither venue has been traded by AffMiss, so fills, slippage, withdrawals and support are not compared.

FactKuCoinBitget
Founded20172018
Products on recordFutures, SpotFutures, Spot, Copy trading
Fee tier usedLV0Standard (non-VIP)
Funded AffMiss testNot runNot run
SourceKuCoin — VIP Levels & FeesBitget Support — Understanding futures fees

Where each one is cheaper

Both lists are generated from the published fees above, measured against the median of every venue on this site.

KuCoin

In its favour

  • Base fees sit on the median of this set: nothing is expensive

Against it

  • Futures taker 0.06%, above the 0.05% median of the 9 venues here
  • No options fee schedule on record here, so it is not ranked for options
  • No funded test yet: fills, slippage, withdrawals and support are unmeasured
The full fee breakdown
Bitget

In its favour

  • Copy trading offered

Against it

  • Futures taker 0.06%, above the 0.05% median of the 9 venues here
  • No options fee schedule on record here, so it is not ranked for options
  • No funded test yet: fills, slippage, withdrawals and support are unmeasured
The full fee breakdown

Which one to open

Neither of these is a general recommendation. Match the account to the orders you actually place, and check that the venue serves your country before anything else.

Pick KuCoin if

Spot traders who want a wide token list and can pay fees in KCS for the 20% discount.

Not for

Takers on futures (0.06% base) and anyone trading Class B or C spot pairs without checking the class first.

Read the review
Pick Bitget if

Traders who came for copy trading and mostly rest limit orders, where 0.02% maker matches the field.

Not for

Market-order traders: 0.06% is the highest base taker rate in this set, level with KuCoin and Phemex.

Read the review

Questions about this pair

At the base tier KuCoin lists 0.02% maker / 0.06% taker and Bitget lists 0.02% / 0.06%. Both list the same taker rate (0.06%). Both list the same maker rate (0.02%).

Disclosure for this comparison

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission if you open an account. It does not change the fee index, the order of this page, or what we write.

AffMiss may be paid a commission by KuCoin or Bitget when a reader opens an account through a link on this page. Commission is not an input to the fee index.

Crypto assets are volatile and leveraged trading can lose all deposited funds. This page is research, not advice. Read the full risk warning.