Ranked by need

The cheapest exchange depends on the orders you place.

The main board weighs futures taker, futures maker and spot fees together. That suits nobody exactly: a trader who rests limit orders and one who hits the market are not paying the same fee. Each ranking below re-weights the same published fees for one way of trading and prints the weights it used.

AffiliateAffMiss may be paid a commission by venues listed here. No ranking moves on commission: the weights are printed on every page.How we are paid

Same fees, three different questions

A ranking is not a new measurement. It is the same published fees, read through the weights that match one way of trading.

The formulas and weights
Every ranking uses the same fee readings as the reviews. Nothing is re-read or estimated for a ranking.
Eligibility is a product check. A venue with no options schedule on record is not ranked for options, however cheap its futures are.
A ranking orders published fees. It is not a statement about safety, liquidity or whether a venue serves your country.
Commission never enters the arithmetic. The weights are printed on every page.

Where each ranking lands

One row per ranking, with the venue that currently leads it and the gap to the runner-up. The same venue can lead one ranking and sit mid-table on another.

RankingCurrent leaderScoreRunner-upGapMain board rank of the leader
FuturesMEXC8.0Deribit0.1#1 of 9
OptionsDeribit7.4OKX0.2#2 of 9
Low feesMEXC8.2Deribit0.4#1 of 9

Where two venues are level, the table says so rather than inventing a winner.

Start from the fee schedule, not the ranking

Every ranking here is derived from the fee schedules recorded in the reviews, each with its source and the date it was read.