Bybit
OKX
KuCoin
Binance
Deribit
Phemex
MEXC
Bitget
Copy trading on spot and futures
0.02% maker and 0.06% taker on perpetuals at the base tier.
- Futures maker
- 0.0200%
- Futures taker
- 0.0600%
- Spot taker
- 0.1000%
- Fees checked
- 10 November 2026
Head to head
Bitget vs BingX
Copy trading on both, 0.02% maker on both. BingX is cheaper for market orders: 0.05% against Bitget’s 0.06%.
6.0/10
BingX
Copy trading with 0.05% futures taker
0.02% maker and 0.05% taker on perpetuals at the base tier.
- Futures maker
- 0.0200%
- Futures taker
- 0.0500%
- Spot taker
- 0.1000%
- Fees checked
- 10 November 2026
The short version
Bitget or BingX: what the published fees say.
BingX has the higher fee index: 6.4 against 6.0. The index is built only from each venue’s published base-tier fees.
BingX has the lower futures taker rate: 0.05% against 0.06%. Both list the same futures maker rate (0.02%). Two market orders on a $10,000 position cost $12.00 at Bitget and $10.00 at BingX, before funding.
Bitget: copy trading on spot and futures. BingX: copy trading with 0.05% futures taker. Neither venue has been through a funded AffMiss test, so this page compares what each one publishes, not how each one fills.
Both venues are scored with the same formulas on fees read the same day. If a figure here disagrees with the venue’s fee page, the fee page is right and this page is out of date.
Where they separate
The fee index scores each venue’s published base-tier fees with the same formulas and weights. The edge column shows which venue scores higher on that line, and by how much.
| Area | Weight | Bitget | BingX | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Futures taker fee | 40 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 BingX |
| Futures maker fee | 30 | 6.0 | 6.0 | level |
| Spot fees | 30 | 6.0 | 6.0 | level |
| Bitget 0.06% taker on perpetuals. Standard (non-VIP) rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026.BingX 0.05% taker on perpetuals. Ordinary user rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026. | ||||
| Bitget 0.02% maker on perpetuals. Standard (non-VIP) rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026.BingX 0.02% maker on perpetuals. Ordinary user rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026. | ||||
| Bitget 0.10% maker / 0.10% taker on spot. Standard (non-VIP) rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026.BingX 0.10% maker / 0.10% taker on spot. Ordinary user rate on the venue’s published schedule, read 10 November 2026. | ||||
Bitget vs BingX fees
Published base-tier rates from each venue’s own fee page. The cheaper side of each row is marked. Withdrawal fees are set per coin and network and are not compared here.
| Fee | Bitget | BingX | Lower cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Futures maker | 0.02% | 0.02% | — |
| Futures taker | 0.06% | 0.05% | BingX |
| Spot maker | 0.10% | 0.10% | — |
| Spot taker | 0.10% | 0.10% | — |
| Two taker fills on $10,000 | $12.00 | $10.00 | BingX |
| Options maker / taker | Not on record | Not on record | — |
| Fees last read | 10 November 2026 | 10 November 2026 | — |
Fee tiers, VIP bands and promotions move without notice. Treat these rows as dated readings and the order ticket as the binding number.
What each venue offers
The facts behind the fee rows, and the limits of this page: neither venue has been traded by AffMiss, so fills, slippage, withdrawals and support are not compared.
| Fact | Bitget | BingX |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Products on record | Futures, Spot, Copy trading | Futures, Spot, Copy trading |
| Fee tier used | Standard (non-VIP) | Ordinary user |
| Funded AffMiss test | Not run | Not run |
| Source | Bitget Support — Understanding futures fees | BingX Support — Perpetual Futures fee schedule |
Where each one is cheaper
Both lists are generated from the published fees above, measured against the median of every venue on this site.
BitgetIn its favour
- Copy trading offered
Against it
- Futures taker 0.06%, above the 0.05% median of the 9 venues here
- No options fee schedule on record here, so it is not ranked for options
- No funded test yet: fills, slippage, withdrawals and support are unmeasured
BingXIn its favour
- Copy trading offered
Against it
- No options fee schedule on record here, so it is not ranked for options
- No funded test yet: fills, slippage, withdrawals and support are unmeasured
Which one to open
Neither of these is a general recommendation. Match the account to the orders you actually place, and check that the venue serves your country before anything else.
Traders who came for copy trading and mostly rest limit orders, where 0.02% maker matches the field.
Not for
Read the reviewMarket-order traders: 0.06% is the highest base taker rate in this set, level with KuCoin and Phemex.
Copy traders who want Binance-level base futures rates (0.02% / 0.05%).
Not for
Read the reviewOptions traders (none listed here) and spot traders looking for a rate below 0.10%.
Questions about this pair
At the base tier Bitget lists 0.02% maker / 0.06% taker and BingX lists 0.02% / 0.05%. BingX has the lower taker rate: 0.05% against 0.06%. Both list the same maker rate (0.02%).
Bitget lists 0.10% maker / 0.10% taker on spot; BingX lists 0.10% / 0.10%. These are base-tier rates for each venue’s main pair group.
AffMiss has no options fee schedule on record for either venue.
No. Every figure on this page was read from the two venues’ published fee schedules on 10 November 2026. AffMiss has not run a funded test on either venue, and the rate on your own order ticket is the one that applies.
Disclosure for this comparison
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission if you open an account. It does not change the fee index, the order of this page, or what we write.
AffMiss may be paid a commission by Bitget or BingX when a reader opens an account through a link on this page. Commission is not an input to the fee index.
Crypto assets are volatile and leveraged trading can lose all deposited funds. This page is research, not advice. Read the full risk warning.